Does SQLite Work With Netlify?
SQLite can work with Netlify Functions, but filesystem persistence is unreliable; use it for read-heavy workloads or combine with external storage.
Quick Facts
How SQLite Works With Netlify
SQLite integrates with Netlify through serverless functions (Node.js runtime), but with significant architectural caveats. Each function invocation runs in an ephemeral container with a writable /tmp directory that persists only during that execution context. This means SQLite database files stored locally will be lost between requests, making traditional persistent SQLite impractical for production use.
The practical approach is using SQLite as a read-only reference database or cache layer. Developers bundle a pre-built SQLite database file with their function deployment, query it for fast local access without network latency, then write changes to a persistent backend like Postgres or DynamoDB. Alternatively, use sqlite3 in-memory databases for per-request computations. For true persistence with SQLite, mount it via a volume service like Netlify's upcoming persistent storage or migrate to a managed database solution.
The developer experience is straightforward for read-heavy applications: install better-sqlite3 or sql.js, include your database file in the deployment bundle, and query it directly in your function handler. Network round-trips to external databases are eliminated for read operations, improving cold-start performance. However, this pattern requires discipline around data freshness and careful synchronization between your SQLite bundle and primary data store.
Best Use Cases
Quick Setup
npm install better-sqlite3import Database from 'better-sqlite3';
import path from 'path';
export default async (req, context) => {
try {
// Point to bundled database file
const dbPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'data.db');
const db = new Database(dbPath, { readonly: true });
// Execute read-only query
const stmt = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = ?');
const product = stmt.get(req.queryStringParameters?.id || 1);
db.close();
return {
statusCode: 200,
body: JSON.stringify(product),
};
} catch (error) {
return {
statusCode: 500,
body: JSON.stringify({ error: error.message }),
};
}
};Known Issues & Gotchas
Database file changes are lost after function execution due to ephemeral filesystem
Fix: Use SQLite only for reads, or architect writes to flow to a persistent backend (Postgres, DynamoDB) and rebuild/deploy the SQLite bundle separately
SQLite database files bundled in deployments increase function size and cold-start latency
Fix: Keep SQLite files under 50MB; compress if possible; consider lazy-loading only necessary tables or use separate functions for different datasets
Concurrent writes from multiple function instances cause database locks and failures
Fix: Never attempt writes in serverless functions; SQLite is single-writer by design and incompatible with horizontal scaling
SQLite bundled in deployment becomes stale if source data changes outside the deploy pipeline
Fix: Implement automated rebuild/redeploy triggers when source data changes, or sync SQLite from primary database at function startup
Alternatives
- •Postgres with Vercel/Netlify (managed relational database with proper persistence and scaling)
- •DynamoDB + Netlify Functions (serverless NoSQL with built-in persistence, better cold-start)
- •Supabase (Postgres-backed with SQLite compatibility layer, includes real-time features)
Resources
Related Compatibility Guides
Explore more compatibility guides